Use the Jorvik Profile (CON02)

Level \(\rightarrow\) Advisory

Category

Safety:: \(\checkmark\)
Cyber:: \(\checkmark\)

Goal

Maintainability:: \(\checkmark\)
Reliability:: \(\checkmark\)
Portability:: \(\checkmark\)
Performance:: \(\checkmark\)
Security:

Remediation \(\rightarrow\) High

Verification Method \(\rightarrow\) GNATcheck rule: uses_profile:jorvik

Mutually Exclusive \(\rightarrow\) CON01

Reference

Ada Reference Manual: D.13 The Ravenscar and Jorvik Profiles

Description

The following profile must be in effect:

pragma Profile (Jorvik);

The profile is equivalent to the following set of pragmas:

pragma Task_Dispatching_Policy (FIFO_Within_Priorities);
pragma Locking_Policy (Ceiling_Locking);
pragma Detect_Blocking;
pragma Restrictions (
           No_Abort_Statements,
           No_Dynamic_Attachment,
           No_Dynamic_CPU_Assignment,
           No_Dynamic_Priorities,
           No_Local_Protected_Objects,
           No_Local_Timing_Events,
           No_Protected_Type_Allocators,
           No_Requeue_Statements,
           No_Select_Statements,
           No_Specific_Termination_Handlers,
           No_Task_Allocators,
           No_Task_Hierarchy,
           No_Task_Termination,
           Pure_Barriers,
           Max_Task_Entries => 0,
           No_Dependence => Ada.Asynchronous_Task_Control,
           No_Dependence => Ada.Execution_Time.Group_Budgets,
           No_Dependence => Ada.Execution_Time.Timers,
           No_Dependence => Ada.Task_Attributes,
           No_Dependence => System.Multiprocessors.Dispatching_Domains);

The following restrictions are part of the Ravenscar profile but not part of the Jorvik profile.

No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations
No_Relative_Delay
Max_Entry_Queue_Length => 1
Max_Protected_Entries => 1
No_Dependence => Ada.Calendar
No_Dependence => Ada.Synchronous_Barriers

Jorvik also replaces restriction Simple_Barriers with Pure_Barriers (a weaker requirement than the restriction Simple_Barriers).

Applicable Vulnerability within ISO TR 24772-2

6.59 Concurrency - Activation [GGA]
6.60 Concurrency - Directed termination [CGT]
6.61 Concurrent data access [CGX]
6.62 Concurrency - Premature termination [CGS]
6.63 Lock protocol errors [CGM]

Applicable Common Weakness Enumeration

Noncompliant Code Example

Any code disallowed by the profile. Remediation is high because use of the facilities outside the subset can be difficult to retrofit into compliance.

   task body Task_T is
   begin
      -- Error: Max_Task_Entries => 0
      accept Entry_Point do
         Put_Line ("Hello World");
      end Entry_Point;
      loop
         delay 1.0;
         Put_Line ("Ping");
      end loop;
   end Task_T;

Compliant Code Example

   task body Task_T is
   begin
      delay 1.0;
      Put_Line ("Hello World");
      loop
         delay 1.0;
         Put_Line ("Ping");
      end loop;
   end Task_T;

Notes

The Ada builder will detect violations. GNATcheck can also detect violations.